LVF (Location Validation Function): Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A functional element in an [[NGCS (NG9-1-1 Core Services)|NGCS]] that is a [[LoST (Location to Service Translation)|LoST]] protocol server where civic location information is validated against the authoritative GIS database information. A civic address is considered valid if it can be located within the database uniquely, is suitable to provide an accurate route for an emergency call and adequate and specific enough to direct responders to the right location. |
A functional element in an [[NGCS (NG9-1-1 Core Services)|NGCS]] that is a [[LoST (Location to Service Translation)|LoST]] protocol server where civic location information is validated against the authoritative GIS database information. A civic address is considered valid if it can be located within the database uniquely, is suitable to provide an accurate route for an emergency call and adequate and specific enough to direct responders to the right location. |
||
== Relevant NENA Documents == |
|||
[https://www.nena.org/?page=ProvGISECRFLVF NENA Standards for the Provisioning and Maintenance of GIS data to ECRF and LVFs NENA‑STA‑005] |
|||
[https://www.nena.org/?NG911_PSAP_REQ NENA/APCO NG9-1-1 PSAP Requirements NENA/APCO-REQ-001] |
|||
[[Category:Glossary]] |
[[Category:Glossary]] |
||
Revision as of 14:53, 14 April 2018
A functional element in an NGCS that is a LoST protocol server where civic location information is validated against the authoritative GIS database information. A civic address is considered valid if it can be located within the database uniquely, is suitable to provide an accurate route for an emergency call and adequate and specific enough to direct responders to the right location.
Relevant NENA Documents
NENA Standards for the Provisioning and Maintenance of GIS data to ECRF and LVFs NENA‑STA‑005 NENA/APCO NG9-1-1 PSAP Requirements NENA/APCO-REQ-001