3,018
edits
NENA NG9-1-1 Go-To Handbook: Difference between revisions
Removed unnecessary returns
MikeVislocky (talk | contribs) (Added links, minor typo edits.) |
MikeVislocky (talk | contribs) (Removed unnecessary returns) |
||
Line 202:
'''References:'''
[https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.nena.org/resource/resmgr/ngpp/ng911_transition_policy_impl.pdf Next Generation 9-1-1 Transition Policy Implementation Handbook]<ref name=":5">[http://www.nena.org/resource/resmgr/ngpp/ng911_transition_policy_hand.pdf Next Generation 9-1-1 Transition Policy Implementation Handbook (March 2010)] This document is dated; perhaps outdated. It references June 2011 Overview of Colorado 911</ref>: NG9-1-1 Transition Policy Issue Number: Two
[http://www.nena.org/?NGPP_911FundingRpt Next Generation 911 Cost Estimate]<ref name=":14" />: Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5
Line 325 ⟶ 323:
[https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4014 The USDoT 911 Initiative Transition Plan Document]<ref name=":3" />: How NG9-1-1 Could Be Implemented Across the Nation: Implementation Environments and Potential Deployment Approaches.
[https://www.nena.org/?page=NG911_TransitionPlng NG9-1-1 Transition Planning Considerations – NENA-INF-008.2-2013]<ref name=":6" />: Section 9.4.3
[https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4016 USDoT NG9-1-1 POC Test Plan]<ref>[https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4016 USDoT NG9-1-1 POC Test Plan] The reader should note that the USDoT POC test plan document provides information that can help organize system testing, but the Proof Of Concept tests represented only part of the overall NG9-1-1 system as applicable to the specific POC objectives.</ref>: Appendix D – Use Case Tests.
Line 337 ⟶ 333:
'''Reference:'''
[https://www.nena.org/?page=NG911_Security NENA Security for Next-Generation 9-1-1 Standard (NG-SEC) NENA 75-001v1]<ref name=":10" />: Section 11: Compliance Audits and Reviews.
== Acquisition ==
| |||